head to head · open source

Mole vs pomatez

Mole has 67,731 GitHub stars, 2,382 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pomatez has 4,892 stars, 210 forks, 167 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Mole leads on adoption by 1,285% (67,731 vs 4,892 stars). Mole is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; pomatez is written in TypeScript under MIT. Mole has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, pomatez 4%. Mole was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mole ★ 68K pomatez ★ 4.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mole pomatez
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 4.9K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Shell TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-19
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 210
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mole if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mole profile →

pick pomatez if

  • You want the pomatez feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and pomatez fits your workflow better

full pomatez profile →

About Mole

Mole is an open source macOS utility that combines system cleanup, application management, and live monitoring into a single native app and CLI tool. It runs on macOS 12+ for both Intel and Apple Silicon, offering a unified interface for reclaiming disk space, uninstalling apps thoroughly, visualizing storage, and tracking real time system health. Built in Shell and licensed under GPL 3.0, it aggregates functionality found across several paid tools—CleanMyMac, AppCleaner, DaisyDisk, and iStat Menus—into one binary.

read the full Mole overview →

About pomatez

Pomatez is a free, open source Pomodoro timer desktop application written in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, built for Windows, macOS, and Linux users who want structured work and break cycles running locally on their own machine.

read the full pomatez overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

Mole vs nnn Mole vs Pearcleaner Mole vs BleachBit Mole vs dua-cli Mole vs gdu Mole vs RyTuneX Mole vs memories Mole vs portabase Mole vs resticprofile Mole vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Mole or pomatez more popular?

Mole has 67,731 GitHub stars and pomatez has 4,892. Mole has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mole and pomatez free?

Both are open source. Mole is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pomatez under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mole and pomatez?

Mole is written in Shell and pomatez in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mole or pomatez?

Choose Mole if you want the larger community (67,731 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pomatez if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.