head to head · open source

Mole vs burrow

Mole has 67,748 GitHub stars, 2,383 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. burrow has 1,429 stars, 176 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mole leads on adoption by 4,641% (67,748 vs 1,429 stars). Mole is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; burrow is written in Swift under MIT. Mole has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, burrow 12%. Mole was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cleaner, macos), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mole ★ 68K burrow ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mole burrow
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 1.4K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Shell Swift
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mole if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mole profile →

pick burrow if

  • You want the burrow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and burrow fits your workflow better

full burrow profile →

About Mole

Mole is an open source macOS utility that combines system cleanup, application management, and live monitoring into a single native app and CLI tool. It runs on macOS 12+ for both Intel and Apple Silicon, offering a unified interface for reclaiming disk space, uninstalling apps thoroughly, visualizing storage, and tracking real time system health. Built in Shell and licensed under GPL 3.0, it aggregates functionality found across several paid tools—CleanMyMac, AppCleaner, DaisyDisk, and iStat Menus—into one binary.

read the full Mole overview →

About burrow

Burrow is a free, open source (MIT), native macOS app that combines junk cleanup, app management, maintenance, disk analysis, and live system status in one window, with a built in MCP server so AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor can query and care for the same machine.

read the full burrow overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

Mole vs nnn Mole vs Pearcleaner Mole vs BleachBit Mole vs dua-cli Mole vs gdu Mole vs RyTuneX Mole vs pomatez Mole vs memories Mole vs portabase Mole vs resticprofile Mole vs curbox-android Mole vs git-sync

Frequently asked questions

Is Mole or burrow more popular?

Mole has 67,748 GitHub stars and burrow has 1,429. Mole has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mole and burrow free?

Both are open source. Mole is licensed under GPL-3.0 and burrow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mole and burrow?

Mole is written in Shell and burrow in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mole or burrow?

Choose Mole if you want the larger community (67,748 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose burrow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.