head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Integuru
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Integuru has 4,791 stars, 378 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 362% (22,125 vs 4,791 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Integuru is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Integuru 8%. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | Integuru | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 4.8K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-06-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 378 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Integuru if
- You want the Integuru feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Integuru fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About Integuru
Integuru v0 This repo contains the earliest version of the Integuru agent we released publicly. It shows the original approach: using browser network requests to generate runnable integration code for platforms without official APIs. We've kept building since then. The newest version of Integuru is available at www.integuru.com. Integuru v0 in Action What Integuru v0 Does You use to generate a file containing all browser network requests, a file with the cookies, and write a prompt describing the action triggered in the browser. The agent outputs runnable Python code that hits the platform's internal endpoints…
read the full Integuru overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or Integuru more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars and Integuru has 4,791. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and Integuru free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Integuru under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and Integuru?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and Integuru in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or Integuru?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,125 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Integuru if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.