head to head · open source

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Integuru

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,797 GitHub stars, 3,762 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Integuru has 4,766 stars, 382 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 357% (21,797 vs 4,766 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; Integuru is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Integuru 8%. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF ★ 22K Integuru ★ 4.8K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Integuru
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 4.8K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-06-24
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 382
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF profile →

pick Integuru if

  • You want the Integuru feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Integuru fits your workflow better

full Integuru profile →

About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an open source, automated, all in one framework for mobile application security testing across Android, iOS, and Windows Mobile that performs static and dynamic analysis for penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy assessment, built for security researchers, penetration testers, and DevSecOps teams.

read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →

About Integuru

Integuru is an open source Python AI agent that builds permissionless integrations by reverse engineering platforms' internal APIs, aimed at developers who need to automate a platform that provides no public API of its own.

read the full Integuru overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs fastapi Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Hoppscotch Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Bruno Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Insomnia Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs one-api Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs OpenAPI-Specification Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs openapi-generator Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs redoc Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs SafeLine Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs grpc-gateway Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Yaak Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or Integuru more popular?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,797 GitHub stars and Integuru has 4,766. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and Integuru free?

Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Integuru under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and Integuru?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript and Integuru in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or Integuru?

Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (21,797 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Integuru if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.