head to head · open source

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs hurl

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,789 GitHub stars, 3,760 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. hurl has 19,203 stars, 745 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 13% (21,789 vs 19,203 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; hurl is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, hurl 4%. hurl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (api-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF ★ 22K hurl ★ 19K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF hurl
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 19K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 745
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF profile →

pick hurl if

  • You want the hurl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and hurl fits your workflow better

full hurl profile →

About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an open source, automated, all in one framework for mobile application security testing across Android, iOS, and Windows Mobile that performs static and dynamic analysis for penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy assessment, built for security researchers, penetration testers, and DevSecOps teams.

read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →

About hurl

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format. It lives in the Rust ecosystem, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and is powered under the hood by libcurl, so it inherits curl's transfer behavior while adding a readable file format on top. A single Hurl file can chain multiple requests, capture values from one response, and reuse those values in later requests, which makes it possible to describe an entire HTTP session rather than a single call. The project has been on GitHub for six years and carries roughly 19,000 stars and 744 forks.

read the full hurl overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs fastapi Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Hoppscotch Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Bruno Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Insomnia Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs one-api Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs OpenAPI-Specification Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs openapi-generator Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs redoc Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs SafeLine Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs grpc-gateway Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Yaak Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Apache APISIX

Frequently asked questions

Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or hurl more popular?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,789 GitHub stars and hurl has 19,203. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and hurl free?

Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and hurl under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and hurl?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript and hurl in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or hurl?

Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (21,789 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose hurl if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.