head to head · open source

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs django-ninja

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,789 GitHub stars, 3,760 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. django-ninja has 9,191 stars, 613 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 137% (21,789 vs 9,191 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; django-ninja is written in Python under MIT. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, django-ninja 7%. django-ninja was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF ★ 22K django-ninja ★ 9.2K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF django-ninja
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 9.2K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 613
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF profile →

pick django-ninja if

  • You want the django-ninja feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and django-ninja fits your workflow better

full django-ninja profile →

About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an open source, automated, all in one framework for mobile application security testing across Android, iOS, and Windows Mobile that performs static and dynamic analysis for penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy assessment, built for security researchers, penetration testers, and DevSecOps teams.

read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →

About django-ninja

Django Ninja is a web framework for building APIs with Django and Python 3.6+ type hints. It lives in the Python ecosystem and the Django ecosystem specifically, and it is distributed under the MIT license. The framework is designed around type hints, Pydantic, and async support, and it generates API schemas from the open standards for APIs: OpenAPI (previously known as Swagger) and JSON Schema. A NinjaAPI instance is declared next to the existing Django url configuration and mounted as a normal URL pattern, so the project sits alongside Django rather than replacing any part of it.

read the full django-ninja overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs fastapi Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Hoppscotch Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Bruno Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Insomnia Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs one-api Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs OpenAPI-Specification Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs openapi-generator Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs redoc Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs SafeLine Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs grpc-gateway Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs Yaak Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or django-ninja more popular?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 21,789 GitHub stars and django-ninja has 9,191. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and django-ninja free?

Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and django-ninja under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and django-ninja?

Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in JavaScript and django-ninja in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or django-ninja?

Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (21,789 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose django-ninja if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.