head to head · open source

Milvus vs TiDB

Milvus has 46,145 GitHub stars, 4,254 forks, 1,405 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TiDB has 40,541 stars, 6,242 forks, 6,976 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Milvus leads on adoption by 14% (46,145 vs 40,541 stars). Milvus is written in Go under Apache-2.0; TiDB is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Milvus has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, TiDB 15%. TiDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cloud-native), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Milvus ★ 46K TiDB ★ 41K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Milvus TiDB
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 41K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.3K ⑂ 6.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Milvus if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Milvus profile →

pick TiDB if

  • You want the TiDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and TiDB fits your workflow better

full TiDB profile →

About Milvus

Milvus is a high performance, cloud native vector database written in Go and C++, designed to power AI applications by efficiently storing, indexing, and searching large scale unstructured data such as text, images, and multi modal embeddings. It implements hardware accelerated approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search using algorithms like HNSW, FAISS, and DiskANN, and supports both real time streaming updates and batch ingestion. Milvus lives in the GenAI infrastructure ecosystem, serving as the persistent storage and retrieval layer for embedding based workloads including RAG, recommendation, and image search.…

read the full Milvus overview →

About TiDB

TiDB is an open source, cloud native, distributed SQL database written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, aimed at teams that need ACID transactions, real time analytics, and vector search at scale without data silos.

read the full TiDB overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs milvus mall vs tidb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Milvus vs mall Milvus vs Prometheus Milvus vs NocoDB Milvus vs etcd Milvus vs DBeaver Milvus vs orm Milvus vs drawDB Milvus vs typeorm Milvus vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Milvus vs Qdrant Milvus vs rocksdb Milvus vs InfluxDB

Frequently asked questions

Is Milvus or TiDB more popular?

Milvus has 46,145 GitHub stars and TiDB has 40,541. Milvus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Milvus and TiDB free?

Both are open source. Milvus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TiDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Milvus and TiDB?

Milvus is written in Go and TiDB in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Milvus or TiDB?

Choose Milvus if you want the larger community (46,145 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose TiDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.