head to head · open source

mall vs GRDB.swift

mall has 84,792 GitHub stars, 29,827 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. GRDB.swift has 8,650 stars, 1,046 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. mall leads on adoption by 880% (84,792 vs 8,650 stars). mall is written in Java under Apache-2.0; GRDB.swift is written in Swift under MIT. mall has attracted 35% as many forks as stars, GRDB.swift 12%. GRDB.swift was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mall ★ 85K GRDB.swift ★ 8.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

mall GRDB.swift
GitHub stars ★ 85K ★ 8.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Swift
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 30K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mall if

  • You weight community size — 85K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mall profile →

pick GRDB.swift if

  • You want the GRDB.swift feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and GRDB.swift fits your workflow better

full GRDB.swift profile →

About mall

mall is a complete e commerce system built on Spring Boot and MyBatis, distributed as a Java project under the Apache 2.0 license. It ships two applications in one repository: a storefront system for shoppers and an administrative back office for operators. The storefront covers the home portal, product recommendation, product search, product display, shopping cart, order flow, member center, customer service, and help center. The back office covers product management, order management, member management, promotion management, operations management, content management, statistics reports, finance management, perm…

read the full mall overview →

About GRDB.swift

GRDB.swift is an MIT licensed Swift toolkit for SQLite databases, focused on application development, for Swift developers who need to store an app's permanent data on iOS, macOS, tvOS, or watchOS without hand writing SQL and raw row handling.

read the full GRDB.swift overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs openvpn mall vs wr-do mall vs plakar mall vs pluton supabase vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

mall vs Prometheus mall vs NocoDB mall vs etcd mall vs DBeaver mall vs orm mall vs Milvus mall vs TiDB mall vs drawDB mall vs typeorm mall vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager mall vs Qdrant mall vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is mall or GRDB.swift more popular?

mall has 84,792 GitHub stars and GRDB.swift has 8,650. mall has the larger community by that measure.

Are mall and GRDB.swift free?

Both are open source. mall is licensed under Apache-2.0 and GRDB.swift under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mall and GRDB.swift?

mall is written in Java and GRDB.swift in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mall or GRDB.swift?

Choose mall if you want the larger community (84,792 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose GRDB.swift if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.