head to head · open source

NocoDB vs lowdb

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars, 5,058 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped today. lowdb has 22,580 stars, 962 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 188% (65,016 vs 22,580 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; lowdb is written in JavaScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, lowdb 4%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K lowdb ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB lowdb
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 23K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-03-27
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 962
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick lowdb if

  • You want the lowdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and lowdb fits your workflow better

full lowdb profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About lowdb

lowdb is a small, MIT licensed embedded JSON database for JavaScript and TypeScript that persists data to a plain db.json file, aimed at Node.js, Electron, and browser projects that need local storage without running a database server.

read the full lowdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or lowdb more popular?

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars and lowdb has 22,580. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and lowdb free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and lowdb is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and lowdb?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and lowdb in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or lowdb?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,016 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose lowdb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.