head to head · open source

LocalSend vs xplorer

LocalSend has 92,496 GitHub stars, 5,160 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. xplorer has 5,674 stars, 379 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 1,530% (92,496 vs 5,674 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; xplorer is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, xplorer 7%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K xplorer ★ 5.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend xplorer
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 5.7K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Dart TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 379
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick xplorer if

  • You want the xplorer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xplorer fits your workflow better

full xplorer profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About xplorer

Xplorer is a cross platform, AI integrated desktop file manager built as a Tauri 2 application with a Rust backend and a React frontend, aimed at developers, researchers, students, and power users who want more from their files than the manager their operating system ships with.

read the full xplorer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or xplorer more popular?

LocalSend has 92,496 GitHub stars and xplorer has 5,674. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and xplorer free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and xplorer under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and xplorer?

LocalSend is written in Dart and xplorer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or xplorer?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,496 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose xplorer if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.