head to head · open source

LocalSend vs ranger

LocalSend has 92,156 GitHub stars, 5,141 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. ranger has 17,405 stars, 942 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 429% (92,156 vs 17,405 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, ranger 5%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K ranger ★ 17K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend ranger
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 17K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 942
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick ranger if

  • You want the ranger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ranger fits your workflow better

full ranger profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop LocalSend vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or ranger more popular?

LocalSend has 92,156 GitHub stars and ranger has 17,405. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and ranger free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ranger under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and ranger?

LocalSend is written in Dart and ranger in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or ranger?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,156 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ranger if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.