head to head · open source

LocalSend vs psitransfer

LocalSend has 93,081 GitHub stars, 5,203 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. psitransfer has 1,953 stars, 247 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 4,666% (93,081 vs 1,953 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; psitransfer is written in JavaScript under BSD-2-Clause. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, psitransfer 13%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 93K psitransfer ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend psitransfer
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Dart JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-06-02
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick psitransfer if

  • You want the psitransfer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and psitransfer fits your workflow better

full psitransfer profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About psitransfer

PsiTransfer is a simple, open source, self hosted file sharing service written in JavaScript under the BSD 2 Clause licence, intended for individuals and teams that want to send large files without accounts, logins or a paid provider.

read the full psitransfer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or psitransfer more popular?

LocalSend has 93,081 GitHub stars and psitransfer has 1,953. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and psitransfer free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and psitransfer under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and psitransfer?

LocalSend is written in Dart and psitransfer in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or psitransfer?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (93,081 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose psitransfer if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.