head to head · open source

LocalSend vs MaterialFiles

LocalSend has 92,380 GitHub stars, 5,151 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. MaterialFiles has 9,022 stars, 738 forks, 611 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 924% (92,380 vs 9,022 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; MaterialFiles is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, MaterialFiles 8%. MaterialFiles was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K MaterialFiles ★ 9.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend MaterialFiles
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 9.0K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 738
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick MaterialFiles if

  • You want the MaterialFiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and MaterialFiles fits your workflow better

full MaterialFiles profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About MaterialFiles

Material Files is a free, open source Material Design file manager for Android 5.0 and later, aimed at Android users who want to browse, manage and modify files — including files that require root access — without handing full device access to a closed source app.

read the full MaterialFiles overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or MaterialFiles more popular?

LocalSend has 92,380 GitHub stars and MaterialFiles has 9,022. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and MaterialFiles free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MaterialFiles under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and MaterialFiles?

LocalSend is written in Dart and MaterialFiles in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or MaterialFiles?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,380 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose MaterialFiles if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.