head to head · open source

LocalSend vs Firefiles

LocalSend has 91,903 GitHub stars, 5,130 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Firefiles has 371 stars, 57 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 24,672% (91,903 vs 371 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; Firefiles is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Firefiles 15%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K Firefiles ★ 371 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend Firefiles
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 371
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Dart TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2025-11-03
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 57
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick Firefiles if

  • You want the Firefiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Firefiles fits your workflow better

full Firefiles profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About Firefiles

Firefiles is an open source, self hosted alternative to Dropbox: a TypeScript and Next.js web application that turns your own cloud storage buckets — such as AWS S3, Backblaze, or Firebase Cloud Storage — into a single browser based drive with a familiar file system interface, built for people who want Dropbox style file management while keeping their files in storage they already own.

read the full Firefiles overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik rustdesk vs localsend n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop LocalSend vs OpenCloud LocalSend vs ownCloud LocalSend vs Sync-in LocalSend vs Hoodik LocalSend vs Cozy LocalSend vs Twake Drive

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or Firefiles more popular?

LocalSend has 91,903 GitHub stars and Firefiles has 371. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and Firefiles free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Firefiles under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and Firefiles?

LocalSend is written in Dart and Firefiles in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or Firefiles?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (91,903 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Firefiles if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.