head to head · open source

LocalSend vs chadtree

LocalSend has 93,513 GitHub stars, 5,228 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chadtree has 1,688 stars, 62 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LocalSend leads on adoption by 5,440% (93,513 vs 1,688 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; chadtree is written in Python under GPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, chadtree 4%. chadtree was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 94K chadtree ★ 1.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend chadtree
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart Python
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-06
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick chadtree if

  • You want the chadtree feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and chadtree fits your workflow better

full chadtree profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About chadtree

CHADTree is a file manager plugin for Neovim, written in Python, aimed at developers who want a fast, feature rich tree explorer as an alternative to NERDTree.

read the full chadtree overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or chadtree more popular?

LocalSend has 93,513 GitHub stars and chadtree has 1,688. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and chadtree free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chadtree under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and chadtree?

LocalSend is written in Dart and chadtree in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or chadtree?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (93,513 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chadtree if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.