head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs kubeshark

worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars, 13,211 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped today. kubeshark has 12,082 stars, 549 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 620% (87,032 vs 12,082 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; kubeshark is written in Go under Apache-2.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, kubeshark 5%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K kubeshark ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor kubeshark
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 12K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 549
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick kubeshark if

  • You want the kubeshark feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kubeshark fits your workflow better

full kubeshark profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About kubeshark

Kubeshark is an Apache 2.0, eBPF powered network observability tool for Kubernetes that indexes cluster wide L4/L7 traffic with full Kubernetes context and makes that traffic queryable by AI agents through the Model Context Protocol and by humans through a real time dashboard.

read the full kubeshark overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or kubeshark more popular?

worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars and kubeshark has 12,082. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and kubeshark free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and kubeshark under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and kubeshark?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and kubeshark in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or kubeshark?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (87,032 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose kubeshark if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.