head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs kubeshark

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars, 4,115 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kubeshark has 12,082 stars, 549 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 139% (28,917 vs 12,082 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; kubeshark is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, kubeshark 5%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K kubeshark ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki kubeshark
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 12K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 549
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick kubeshark if

  • You want the kubeshark feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kubeshark fits your workflow better

full kubeshark profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About kubeshark

Kubeshark is an Apache 2.0, eBPF powered network observability tool for Kubernetes that indexes cluster wide L4/L7 traffic with full Kubernetes context and makes that traffic queryable by AI agents through the Model Context Protocol and by humans through a real time dashboard.

read the full kubeshark overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or kubeshark more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars and kubeshark has 12,082. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and kubeshark free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and kubeshark under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and kubeshark?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and kubeshark in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or kubeshark?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,917 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose kubeshark if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.