head to head · open source

Kestra vs moon

Kestra has 28,146 GitHub stars, 2,997 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. moon has 4,105 stars, 252 forks, 99 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kestra leads on adoption by 586% (28,146 vs 4,105 stars). Kestra is written in Java under Apache-2.0; moon is written in Rust under MIT. Kestra has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, moon 6%. Kestra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kestra ★ 28K moon ★ 4.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kestra moon
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 4.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 252
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kestra if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kestra profile →

pick moon if

  • You want the moon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and moon fits your workflow better

full moon profile →

About Kestra

Kestra is an open source, event driven orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows. It operates in the Java based ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project provides a unified interface for both scheduled and real time automation, supporting declarative workflow definitions in YAML while also offering visual and AI assisted authoring.

read the full Kestra overview →

About moon

moon is a repository management, organization, orchestration, and notification tool for the web ecosystem, written in Rust under the MIT license. It is a build system and monorepo management tool whose concepts are heavily inspired by Bazel and other build systems. The project is associated with build system, monorepo tooling, ci cd, Node.js, JavaScript, Bun, Deno, Go, Python, and Ruby topics.

read the full moon overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs kestra compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Kestra vs compose Kestra vs conductor Kestra vs xxl-job Kestra vs gitleaks Kestra vs haystack Kestra vs rancher Kestra vs Prefect Kestra vs Archon Kestra vs Temporal Kestra vs rowboat Kestra vs Trigger Kestra vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is Kestra or moon more popular?

Kestra has 28,146 GitHub stars and moon has 4,105. Kestra has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kestra and moon free?

Both are open source. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and moon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kestra and moon?

Kestra is written in Java and moon in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kestra or moon?

Choose Kestra if you want the larger community (28,146 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose moon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.