head to head · open source

Kestra vs Inngest

Kestra has 28,146 GitHub stars, 2,997 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Inngest has 5,841 stars, 357 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kestra leads on adoption by 382% (28,146 vs 5,841 stars). Kestra is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. Kestra has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Inngest 6%. Kestra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kestra ★ 28K Inngest ★ 5.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kestra Inngest
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 5.8K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 357
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kestra if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kestra profile →

pick Inngest if

  • You want the Inngest feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Inngest fits your workflow better

full Inngest profile →

About Kestra

Kestra is an open source, event driven orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows. It operates in the Java based ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project provides a unified interface for both scheduled and real time automation, supporting declarative workflow definitions in YAML while also offering visual and AI assisted authoring.

read the full Kestra overview →

About Inngest

Inngest is an open source workflow orchestration platform that lets developers write durable, event driven step functions in their existing language SDKs and run them on serverless, long running servers, or the edge.

read the full Inngest overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs kestra compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Kestra vs compose Kestra vs conductor Kestra vs xxl-job Kestra vs gitleaks Kestra vs haystack Kestra vs rancher Kestra vs Prefect Kestra vs Archon Kestra vs Temporal Kestra vs rowboat Kestra vs Trigger Kestra vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is Kestra or Inngest more popular?

Kestra has 28,146 GitHub stars and Inngest has 5,841. Kestra has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kestra and Inngest free?

Both are open source. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Inngest has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Kestra and Inngest?

Kestra is written in Java and Inngest in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kestra or Inngest?

Choose Kestra if you want the larger community (28,146 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Inngest if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.