head to head · open source

Kestra vs happier

Kestra has 28,275 GitHub stars, 3,023 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. happier has 1,706 stars, 152 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped today. Kestra leads on adoption by 1,557% (28,275 vs 1,706 stars). Kestra is written in Java under Apache-2.0; happier is written in TypeScript under MIT. Kestra has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, happier 9%. happier was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kestra ★ 28K happier ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kestra happier
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 152
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kestra if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kestra profile →

pick happier if

  • You want the happier feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and happier fits your workflow better

full happier profile →

About Kestra

Kestra is an open source, event driven orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows. It operates in the Java based ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project provides a unified interface for both scheduled and real time automation, supporting declarative workflow definitions in YAML while also offering visual and AI assisted authoring.

read the full Kestra overview →

About happier

Happier is an open source, MIT licensed control room for coding agents: it runs Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi and others in parallel on your own machines, and lets you approve, steer, review and commit from web, desktop and mobile clients that are fully end to end encrypted.

read the full happier overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra ansible vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Kestra vs ansible Kestra vs compose Kestra vs conductor Kestra vs xxl-job Kestra vs gitleaks Kestra vs haystack Kestra vs rancher Kestra vs Prefect Kestra vs Archon Kestra vs Temporal Kestra vs rowboat Kestra vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is Kestra or happier more popular?

Kestra has 28,275 GitHub stars and happier has 1,706. Kestra has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kestra and happier free?

Both are open source. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and happier under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kestra and happier?

Kestra is written in Java and happier in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kestra or happier?

Choose Kestra if you want the larger community (28,275 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose happier if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.