head to head · open source

Kestra vs flowable-engine

Kestra has 30,122 GitHub stars, 3,495 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowable-engine has 9,633 stars, 2,902 forks, 411 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. Kestra leads on adoption by 213% (30,122 vs 9,633 stars). Kestra is written in Java under Apache-2.0; flowable-engine is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Kestra has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, flowable-engine 30%. Kestra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kestra ★ 30K flowable-engine ★ 9.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kestra flowable-engine
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 9.6K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-18
Forks ⑂ 3.5K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kestra if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kestra profile →

pick flowable-engine if

  • You want the flowable-engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and flowable-engine fits your workflow better

full flowable-engine profile →

About Kestra

Open source orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows Click on the image to learn how to get started with Kestra in 3 minutes. 🌟 What is Kestra? Kestra is an open source, event driven orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows. It unifies scheduled and event driven automation behind a declarative, language agnostic interface. By bringing Infrastructure as Code best practices to your data, process, and microservice pipelines, you can build reliable workflows directly from the UI in just a few lines of YAML, let the built in AI Copilot write them for you, or generate…

read the full Kestra overview →

About flowable-engine

Flowable ======== Homepage: flowable / flowəb(ə)l / a compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform for developers, system admins and business users. a lightning fast, tried and tested BPMN process engine, CMMN case engine and DMN rule engine written in Java. It is Apache 2.0 licensed open source, with a committed community. can run embedded in a Java application, or as a service on a server, a cluster, and in the cloud. It integrates perfectly with Spring. With a rich Java and REST API, it is the ideal engine for orchestrating human or system activities. Introduction…

read the full flowable-engine overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kestra or flowable-engine more popular?

Kestra has 30,122 GitHub stars and flowable-engine has 9,633. Kestra has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kestra and flowable-engine free?

Both are open source. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flowable-engine under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kestra and flowable-engine?

Kestra is written in Java and flowable-engine in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kestra or flowable-engine?

Choose Kestra if you want the larger community (30,122 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flowable-engine if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.