head to head · open source

JumpServer vs pocket-id

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars, 5,792 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pocket-id has 9,222 stars, 310 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 242% (31,566 vs 9,222 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; pocket-id is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, pocket-id 3%. pocket-id was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K pocket-id ★ 9.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer pocket-id
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 9.2K
License GPL-3.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 310
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick pocket-id if

  • You want the pocket-id feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pocket-id fits your workflow better

full pocket-id profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About pocket-id

Pocket ID is a self hosted, OpenID Connect Certified™ and OAuth 2.0 provider, written in Go, that authenticates users with passkeys and passwords never, aimed at anyone who wants single sign on for their own applications without standing up a heavyweight identity platform.

read the full pocket-id overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs casbin JumpServer vs Sa-Token JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs cas

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or pocket-id more popular?

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars and pocket-id has 9,222. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and pocket-id free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pocket-id under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and pocket-id?

JumpServer is written in Python and pocket-id in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or pocket-id?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,566 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pocket-id if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.