head to head · open source

JumpServer vs melody-auth

JumpServer has 31,568 GitHub stars, 5,794 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. melody-auth has 638 stars, 66 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. JumpServer leads on adoption by 4,848% (31,568 vs 638 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; melody-auth is written in TypeScript under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, melody-auth 10%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K melody-auth ★ 638 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer melody-auth
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 638
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-02
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 66
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick melody-auth if

  • You want the melody-auth feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and melody-auth fits your workflow better

full melody-auth profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About melody-auth

Melody Auth is an MIT licensed, TypeScript written OAuth 2.0 and authentication server that runs on both Cloudflare Workers and Node.js, and it is aimed at teams that want to host their own identity provider instead of renting one.

read the full melody-auth overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs casbin JumpServer vs Sa-Token JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs oauth2-proxy JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or melody-auth more popular?

JumpServer has 31,568 GitHub stars and melody-auth has 638. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and melody-auth free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and melody-auth under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and melody-auth?

JumpServer is written in Python and melody-auth in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or melody-auth?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,568 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose melody-auth if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.