head to head · open source

JumpServer vs fido2-net-lib

JumpServer has 31,898 GitHub stars, 5,809 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped today. fido2-net-lib has 1,458 stars, 201 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 2,088% (31,898 vs 1,458 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; fido2-net-lib is written in C# under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, fido2-net-lib 14%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K fido2-net-lib ★ 1.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer fido2-net-lib
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python C#
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick fido2-net-lib if

  • You want the fido2-net-lib feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and fido2-net-lib fits your workflow better

full fido2-net-lib profile →

About JumpServer

An open source PAM platform (Bastion Host) [![][license shield]][license link] [![][docs shield]][docs link] [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][docker shield]][docker link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github stars shield]][github stars link] English · 中文(简体) · 中文(繁體) · 日本語 · Português (Brasil) · Español · Русский · 한국어 What is JumpServer? JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform that provides DevOps and IT teams with on demand and secure access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, Database and RemoteApp endpoints through a…

read the full JumpServer overview →

About fido2-net-lib

Passkeys FIDO2 .NET Library (WebAuthn) A fully working and battle tested library for passkeys (FIDO2 and WebAuthn) on .NET Releases & Change log 💡 Bitwarden Passwordless API The quickest way to get started with FIDO2 and WebAuthn is with the Bitwarden Passwordless API. It's free up to 10k users and a faster way to start using passkeys on your website or mobile app. Bitwarden Passwordless.dev supports .NET Framework as well as the latest .net 8+. Get started with passwordless.dev Purpose Our purpose is to enable passwordless sign in for all .NET apps (asp, core, native). To provide a developer friendly and well…

read the full fido2-net-lib overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or fido2-net-lib more popular?

JumpServer has 31,898 GitHub stars and fido2-net-lib has 1,458. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and fido2-net-lib free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and fido2-net-lib under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and fido2-net-lib?

JumpServer is written in Python and fido2-net-lib in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or fido2-net-lib?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,898 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose fido2-net-lib if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.