head to head · open source

JumpServer vs fido2-net-lib

JumpServer has 31,569 GitHub stars, 5,793 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped today. fido2-net-lib has 1,452 stars, 202 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. JumpServer leads on adoption by 2,074% (31,569 vs 1,452 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; fido2-net-lib is written in C# under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, fido2-net-lib 14%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K fido2-net-lib ★ 1.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer fido2-net-lib
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python C#
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 202
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick fido2-net-lib if

  • You want the fido2-net-lib feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and fido2-net-lib fits your workflow better

full fido2-net-lib profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About fido2-net-lib

fido2 net lib is an open source, MIT licensed C library that provides a FIDO2 server and WebAuthn relying party implementation for .NET, aimed at developers who want passkey registration and sign in in ASP.NET Core, .NET Core and native .NET applications without writing the credential validation logic themselves.

read the full fido2-net-lib overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs casbin JumpServer vs Sa-Token JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs oauth2-proxy JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or fido2-net-lib more popular?

JumpServer has 31,569 GitHub stars and fido2-net-lib has 1,452. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and fido2-net-lib free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and fido2-net-lib under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and fido2-net-lib?

JumpServer is written in Python and fido2-net-lib in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or fido2-net-lib?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,569 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose fido2-net-lib if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.