head to head · open source
javascript-obfuscator vs BrowserOS
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BrowserOS has 14,225 stars, 1,525 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped yesterday. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 15% (16,318 vs 14,225 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; BrowserOS is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, BrowserOS 11%. BrowserOS was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| javascript-obfuscator | BrowserOS | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 14K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick BrowserOS if
- You want the BrowserOS feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and BrowserOS fits your workflow better
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
About BrowserOS
Website · Docs · Enterprise Free · Open source · Everything runs on your machine A second browser, just for your AI agents. Import your logins from Chrome in one click, connect Claude Code, Codex, or any MCP agent, and hand off your web tasks. Agents run in parallel in their own tabs. You watch live, or replay any session like a video. BrowserOS neo is not a Chrome replacement. It is a secondary browser that sits next to Chrome, made friendly to agents. Get started 1. Install BrowserOS neo Prefer a direct download? Grab it for macOS or Windows. 2. Import from Chrome One click brings over your logins, bookmarks…
read the full BrowserOS overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is javascript-obfuscator or BrowserOS more popular?
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and BrowserOS has 14,225. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.
Are javascript-obfuscator and BrowserOS free?
Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and BrowserOS under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and BrowserOS?
javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and BrowserOS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or BrowserOS?
Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose BrowserOS if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.