head to head · open source
slate vs javascript-obfuscator
slate has 31,747 GitHub stars, 3,306 forks, 653 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. slate leads on adoption by 95% (31,747 vs 16,318 stars). slate is written in TypeScript under MIT; javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause. slate has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, javascript-obfuscator 11%. javascript-obfuscator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| slate | javascript-obfuscator | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 16K |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick slate if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You want the javascript-obfuscator feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and javascript-obfuscator fits your workflow better
About slate
A completely customizable framework for building rich text editors. Why? · Principles · Demo · Examples · Documentation · Contributing! Slate lets you build rich, intuitive editors like those in Medium, Dropbox Paper or Google Docs—which are becoming table stakes for applications on the web—without your codebase getting mired in complexity. It can do this because all of its logic is implemented with a series of plugins, so you aren't ever constrained by what is or isn't in "core". You can think of it like a pluggable implementation of contenteditable built on top of React. It was inspired by libraries like…
read the full slate overview →
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is slate or javascript-obfuscator more popular?
slate has 31,747 GitHub stars and javascript-obfuscator has 16,318. slate has the larger community by that measure.
Are slate and javascript-obfuscator free?
Both are open source. slate is licensed under MIT and javascript-obfuscator under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between slate and javascript-obfuscator?
slate is written in TypeScript and javascript-obfuscator in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, slate or javascript-obfuscator?
Choose slate if you want the larger community (31,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose javascript-obfuscator if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.