head to head · open source
serenity vs javascript-obfuscator
serenity has 33,938 GitHub stars, 3,488 forks, 739 open issues and last shipped yesterday. javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. serenity leads on adoption by 108% (33,938 vs 16,318 stars). serenity is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause. serenity has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, javascript-obfuscator 11%. serenity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| serenity | javascript-obfuscator | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 16K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.5K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick serenity if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You want the javascript-obfuscator feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and javascript-obfuscator fits your workflow better
About serenity
SerenityOS Graphical Unix like operating system for 64 bit x86, Arm, and RISC V computers. FAQ Documentation Build Instructions About SerenityOS is a love letter to '90s user interfaces with a custom Unix like core. It flatters with sincerity by stealing beautiful ideas from various other systems. Roughly speaking, the goal is a marriage between the aesthetic of late 1990s productivity software and the power user accessibility of late 2000s \ nix. This is a system by us, for us, based on the things we like. You can watch videos of the system being developed on YouTube: Andreas Kling's channel Linus Groh's…
read the full serenity overview →
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is serenity or javascript-obfuscator more popular?
serenity has 33,938 GitHub stars and javascript-obfuscator has 16,318. serenity has the larger community by that measure.
Are serenity and javascript-obfuscator free?
Both are open source. serenity is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and javascript-obfuscator under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between serenity and javascript-obfuscator?
serenity is written in C++ and javascript-obfuscator in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, serenity or javascript-obfuscator?
Choose serenity if you want the larger community (33,938 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose javascript-obfuscator if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.