head to head · open source
jaeger vs agentscope-studio
jaeger has 23,375 GitHub stars, 3,223 forks, 547 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agentscope-studio has 665 stars, 147 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. jaeger leads on adoption by 3,415% (23,375 vs 665 stars). jaeger is written in Go under Apache-2.0; agentscope-studio is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. jaeger has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, agentscope-studio 22%. jaeger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (opentelemetry, tracing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| jaeger | agentscope-studio | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 665 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 147 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick jaeger if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agentscope-studio if
- You want the agentscope-studio feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and agentscope-studio fits your workflow better
About jaeger
[![Slack chat][slack img]]( get in touch) [![Unit Tests][ci img]][ci] [![Coverage Status][cov img]][cov] [![Project+Community stats][community badge]][community stats] [![FOSSA Status][fossa img]][fossa] [![OpenSSF Scorecard][openssf img]][openssf] [![OpenSSF Best Practices][openssf bp img]][openssf bp] [![CLOMonitor][clomonitor img]][clomonitor] [![Artifact Hub][artifacthub img]][artifacthub] Jaeger a Distributed Tracing System 💥💥💥 Jaeger v2 is out! Read the blog post and try it out. Quick Start Get Jaeger running in seconds with Docker: For production deployments and more options, see the Getting Started…
read the full jaeger overview →
About agentscope-studio
[!IMPORTANT] Archive Notice AgentScope 2.0 now ships a built in Web UI as part of its batteries included Agent Service — a FastAPI backend paired with a pre built frontend ( examples/web ui ) for building, running and observing agents out of the box. Powered by a unified event stream, it visualizes agent reasoning, tool calls and multimodal content in real time, and offers multi session isolation, Agent Team (leader–worker) orchestration with task planning, permission & human in the loop control, IM channels (Feishu / Discord), MCP & Skill Hub management, session persistence and task scheduling. With these…
read the full agentscope-studio overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is jaeger or agentscope-studio more popular?
jaeger has 23,375 GitHub stars and agentscope-studio has 665. jaeger has the larger community by that measure.
Are jaeger and agentscope-studio free?
Both are open source. jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agentscope-studio under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between jaeger and agentscope-studio?
jaeger is written in Go and agentscope-studio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, jaeger or agentscope-studio?
Choose jaeger if you want the larger community (23,375 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agentscope-studio if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.