head to head · open source

Inngest vs Juggle

Inngest has 5,853 GitHub stars, 358 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Juggle has 1,148 stars, 200 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Inngest leads on adoption by 410% (5,853 vs 1,148 stars). Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence; Juggle is written in Java under GPL-3.0. Inngest has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Juggle 17%. Inngest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Inngest ★ 5.9K Juggle ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Inngest Juggle
GitHub stars ★ 5.9K ★ 1.1K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 358 ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Inngest if

  • You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Inngest profile →

pick Juggle if

  • You want the Juggle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Juggle fits your workflow better

full Juggle profile →

About Inngest

Inngest is an open source workflow orchestration platform that lets developers write durable, event driven step functions in their existing language SDKs and run them on serverless, long running servers, or the edge.

read the full Inngest overview →

About Juggle

Juggle is a low code, zero code and AI assisted microservice API orchestration and system integration platform for Java teams that need to compose existing HTTP, Dubbo and WebService APIs into new endpoints without writing a new service.

read the full Juggle overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Inngest vs ansible Inngest vs compose Inngest vs conductor Inngest vs xxl-job Inngest vs gitleaks Inngest vs Kestra Inngest vs haystack Inngest vs rancher Inngest vs Prefect Inngest vs Archon Inngest vs Temporal Inngest vs rowboat

Frequently asked questions

Is Inngest or Juggle more popular?

Inngest has 5,853 GitHub stars and Juggle has 1,148. Inngest has the larger community by that measure.

Are Inngest and Juggle free?

Both are open source. Inngest has no licence declared in this registry, and Juggle is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Inngest and Juggle?

Inngest is written in Go and Juggle in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Inngest or Juggle?

Choose Inngest if you want the larger community (5,853 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Juggle if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.