head to head · open source

TiDB vs InfluxDB

TiDB has 40,542 GitHub stars, 6,242 forks, 6,976 open issues and last shipped yesterday. InfluxDB has 31,748 stars, 3,718 forks, 2,165 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. TiDB leads on adoption by 28% (40,542 vs 31,748 stars). TiDB is written in Go under Apache-2.0; InfluxDB is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. TiDB has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, InfluxDB 12%. TiDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

TiDB ★ 41K InfluxDB ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

TiDB InfluxDB
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 32K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick TiDB if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full TiDB profile →

pick InfluxDB if

  • You want the InfluxDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and InfluxDB fits your workflow better

full InfluxDB profile →

About TiDB

TiDB is an open source, cloud native, distributed SQL database written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, aimed at teams that need ACID transactions, real time analytics, and vector search at scale without data silos.

read the full TiDB overview →

About InfluxDB

InfluxDB 3 Core is an open source time series database purpose built for real time ingestion, processing, and querying of event and metrics data. It lives in the InfluxDB ecosystem and is the latest major version, generally available since April 2025. Built with Rust and leveraging Apache Arrow, DataFusion, and Parquet, it replaces older versions (v1.x, v2.x) with a new architecture optimized for low latency analytics and interactive workloads.

read the full InfluxDB overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

TiDB vs mall TiDB vs Prometheus TiDB vs NocoDB TiDB vs etcd TiDB vs DBeaver TiDB vs orm TiDB vs Milvus TiDB vs drawDB TiDB vs typeorm TiDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager TiDB vs Qdrant TiDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is TiDB or InfluxDB more popular?

TiDB has 40,542 GitHub stars and InfluxDB has 31,748. TiDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are TiDB and InfluxDB free?

Both are open source. TiDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 and InfluxDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between TiDB and InfluxDB?

TiDB is written in Go and InfluxDB in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, TiDB or InfluxDB?

Choose TiDB if you want the larger community (40,542 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose InfluxDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.