head to head · open source

iFixAi vs vuln-bank

iFixAi has 15,364 GitHub stars, 1,336 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vuln-bank has 933 stars, 340 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 1,547% (15,364 vs 933 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; vuln-bank is written in HTML under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, vuln-bank 36%. iFixAi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

iFixAi ★ 15K vuln-bank ★ 933 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

iFixAi vuln-bank
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 933
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python HTML
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 340
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick iFixAi if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full iFixAi profile →

pick vuln-bank if

  • You want the vuln-bank feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and vuln-bank fits your workflow better

full vuln-bank profile →

About iFixAi

iFixAi is an open source Python auditor that answers, in under 120 seconds, whether an AI agent is actually doing the job it is supposed to do — run either by a human operator or by the agent itself.

read the full iFixAi overview →

About vuln-bank

vuln bank is a deliberately vulnerable banking application — MIT licensed, primarily written in HTML, with 933 stars and 341 forks — built so security engineers, developers, interns, QA analysts and DevSecOps practitioners can practise web, API and LLM application security testing, secure code review and CI/CD security automation in an isolated environment.

read the full vuln-bank overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs ifixai strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

iFixAi vs strix iFixAi vs shannon iFixAi vs SkillSpector iFixAi vs codex-security iFixAi vs garak iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard iFixAi vs giskard-oss iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter iFixAi vs nono iFixAi vs CyberStrike iFixAi vs AiSOC iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is iFixAi or vuln-bank more popular?

iFixAi has 15,364 GitHub stars and vuln-bank has 933. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.

Are iFixAi and vuln-bank free?

Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and vuln-bank under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between iFixAi and vuln-bank?

iFixAi is written in Python and vuln-bank in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, iFixAi or vuln-bank?

Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (15,364 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose vuln-bank if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.