head to head · open source
iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard
iFixAi has 42,613 GitHub stars, 1,775 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. AI-Infra-Guard has 7,306 stars, 715 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iFixAi leads on adoption by 483% (42,613 vs 7,306 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0. iFixAi has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, AI-Infra-Guard 10%. AI-Infra-Guard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-safety, llm-evaluation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | AI-Infra-Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 7.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 715 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AI-Infra-Guard if
- You want the AI-Infra-Guard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and AI-Infra-Guard fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About AI-Infra-Guard
📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan，AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…
read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or AI-Infra-Guard more popular?
iFixAi has 42,613 GitHub stars and AI-Infra-Guard has 7,306. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and AI-Infra-Guard free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AI-Infra-Guard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and AI-Infra-Guard?
iFixAi is written in Python and AI-Infra-Guard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or AI-Infra-Guard?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (42,613 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AI-Infra-Guard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.