head to head · open source
iFixAi vs garak
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars, 1,780 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. garak has 9,834 stars, 1,436 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iFixAi leads on adoption by 337% (43,018 vs 9,834 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0. iFixAi has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, garak 15%. garak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, llm-evaluation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | garak | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 9.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick garak if
- You want the garak feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and garak fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About garak
garak, LLM vulnerability scanner Generative AI Red teaming & Assessment Kit garak checks if an LLM can be made to fail in a way we don't want. garak probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, jailbreaks, and many other weaknesses. If you know nmap or msf / Metasploit Framework, garak does somewhat similar things to them, but for LLMs. garak focuses on ways of making an LLM or dialog system fail. It combines static, dynamic, and adaptive probes to explore this. garak 's a free tool. We love developing it and are always interested in adding functionality to…
read the full garak overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or garak more popular?
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars and garak has 9,834. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and garak free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and garak under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and garak?
iFixAi is written in Python and garak in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or garak?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (43,018 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose garak if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.