head to head · open source

iFixAi vs codex-security

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars, 1,333 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codex-security has 10,750 stars, 797 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iFixAi leads on adoption by 43% (15,323 vs 10,750 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. iFixAi has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, codex-security 7%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cli), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

iFixAi ★ 15K codex-security ★ 11K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

iFixAi codex-security
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick iFixAi if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full iFixAi profile →

pick codex-security if

  • You want the codex-security feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and codex-security fits your workflow better

full codex-security profile →

About iFixAi

iFixAi is an open source Python auditor that answers, in under 120 seconds, whether an AI agent is actually doing the job it is supposed to do — run either by a human operator or by the agent itself.

read the full iFixAi overview →

About codex-security

Codex Security is OpenAI's command line tool and TypeScript SDK, published on npm as @openai/codex security , that finds, validates, and fixes security vulnerabilities in a codebase, and it serves application security engineers, DevSecOps teams, and developers who want that scanning to run from their own terminal or CI.

read the full codex-security overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

iFixAi vs strix iFixAi vs shannon iFixAi vs SkillSpector iFixAi vs garak iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard iFixAi vs giskard-oss iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter iFixAi vs nono iFixAi vs CyberStrike iFixAi vs AiSOC iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents iFixAi vs toolhive

Frequently asked questions

Is iFixAi or codex-security more popular?

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars and codex-security has 10,750. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.

Are iFixAi and codex-security free?

Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and codex-security under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between iFixAi and codex-security?

iFixAi is written in Python and codex-security in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, iFixAi or codex-security?

Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (15,323 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose codex-security if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.