head to head · open source
iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter
iFixAi has 42,613 GitHub stars, 1,775 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,535 stars, 979 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 670% (42,613 vs 5,535 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Agentic-Bug-Hunter 18%. iFixAi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | Agentic-Bug-Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 5.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 979 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You want the Agentic-Bug-Hunter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Agentic-Bug-Hunter fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or Agentic-Bug-Hunter more popular?
iFixAi has 42,613 GitHub stars and Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,535. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and Agentic-Bug-Hunter free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Agentic-Bug-Hunter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
iFixAi is written in Python and Agentic-Bug-Hunter in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (42,613 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.