head to head · open source

strix vs codex-security

strix has 63,281 GitHub stars, 6,903 forks, 383 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security has 10,750 stars, 797 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. strix leads on adoption by 489% (63,281 vs 10,750 stars). strix is written in Python under Apache-2.0; codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. strix has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, codex-security 7%. strix was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

strix ★ 63K codex-security ★ 11K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

strix codex-security
GitHub stars ★ 63K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick strix if

  • You weight community size — 63K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full strix profile →

pick codex-security if

  • You want the codex-security feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and codex-security fits your workflow better

full codex-security profile →

About strix

Strix is an open source AI penetration testing tool that deploys autonomous AI agents against a running codebase to find, validate, and fix application vulnerabilities, built for developers and security teams who want dynamic security testing without the cost and scheduling overhead of manual pentesting.

read the full strix overview →

About codex-security

Codex Security is OpenAI's command line tool and TypeScript SDK, published on npm as @openai/codex security , that finds, validates, and fixes security vulnerabilities in a codebase, and it serves application security engineers, DevSecOps teams, and developers who want that scanning to run from their own terminal or CI.

read the full codex-security overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

strix vs shannon strix vs SkillSpector strix vs iFixAi strix vs garak strix vs AI-Infra-Guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter strix vs nono strix vs CyberStrike strix vs AiSOC strix vs pentest-ai-agents strix vs toolhive

Frequently asked questions

Is strix or codex-security more popular?

strix has 63,281 GitHub stars and codex-security has 10,750. strix has the larger community by that measure.

Are strix and codex-security free?

Both are open source. strix is licensed under Apache-2.0 and codex-security under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between strix and codex-security?

strix is written in Python and codex-security in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, strix or codex-security?

Choose strix if you want the larger community (63,281 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose codex-security if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.