head to head · open source

iFixAi vs toolhive

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars, 1,333 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. toolhive has 2,187 stars, 297 forks, 369 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iFixAi leads on adoption by 601% (15,323 vs 2,187 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; toolhive is written in Go under Apache-2.0. iFixAi has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, toolhive 14%. toolhive was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

iFixAi ★ 15K toolhive ★ 2.2K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

iFixAi toolhive
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 297
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick iFixAi if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full iFixAi profile →

pick toolhive if

  • You want the toolhive feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and toolhive fits your workflow better

full toolhive profile →

About iFixAi

iFixAi is an open source Python auditor that answers, in under 120 seconds, whether an AI agent is actually doing the job it is supposed to do — run either by a human operator or by the agent itself.

read the full iFixAi overview →

About toolhive

ToolHive is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed platform written in Go for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. It lives in the AI and machine learning ecosystem, specifically MCP tooling and AI security and privacy. The project addresses the problem of exposing MCP servers to AI coding assistants and enterprise clients without broad local access or unmanaged behavior.

read the full toolhive overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs ifixai strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

iFixAi vs strix iFixAi vs shannon iFixAi vs SkillSpector iFixAi vs codex-security iFixAi vs garak iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard iFixAi vs giskard-oss iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter iFixAi vs nono iFixAi vs CyberStrike iFixAi vs AiSOC iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is iFixAi or toolhive more popular?

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars and toolhive has 2,187. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.

Are iFixAi and toolhive free?

Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and toolhive under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between iFixAi and toolhive?

iFixAi is written in Python and toolhive in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, iFixAi or toolhive?

Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (15,323 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose toolhive if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.