head to head · open source
iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars, 1,780 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentest-ai-agents has 2,400 stars, 452 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 1,692% (43,018 vs 2,400 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; pentest-ai-agents is written in Shell under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, pentest-ai-agents 19%. iFixAi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | pentest-ai-agents | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 452 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pentest-ai-agents if
- You want the pentest-ai-agents feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and pentest-ai-agents fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About pentest-ai-agents
pentest ai agents 50 Claude Code subagents for penetration testing. Quick Start Cheatsheet Coverage Agents Examples Table of Contents What's New in v3.3 What's New in v3.2 Agent Map What's New in v3.1 Quick Start Cheatsheet Coverage Agents Tier 1 vs Tier 2 Examples Running Tools in a Container Findings Database Token Optimization Local Models Documentation MCP Server Prerequisites Legal License pentest ai agents is a collection of 50 Claude Code subagents that turn Claude into an offensive security research assistant. Each agent carries deep domain knowledge in a specific area: recon, web, Active Directory…
read the full pentest-ai-agents overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or pentest-ai-agents more popular?
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars and pentest-ai-agents has 2,400. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and pentest-ai-agents free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pentest-ai-agents under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and pentest-ai-agents?
iFixAi is written in Python and pentest-ai-agents in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or pentest-ai-agents?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (43,018 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pentest-ai-agents if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.