head to head · open source
iFixAi vs NeuroSploit
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars, 1,780 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,499 stars, 357 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 2,770% (43,018 vs 1,499 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. iFixAi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or NeuroSploit more popular?
iFixAi has 43,018 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,499. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and NeuroSploit?
iFixAi is written in Python and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or NeuroSploit?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (43,018 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.