head to head · open source

iFixAi vs code-on-incus

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars, 1,333 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. code-on-incus has 720 stars, 62 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 2,028% (15,323 vs 720 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; code-on-incus is written in Go under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, code-on-incus 9%. iFixAi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

iFixAi ★ 15K code-on-incus ★ 720 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

iFixAi code-on-incus
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 720
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick iFixAi if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full iFixAi profile →

pick code-on-incus if

  • You want the code-on-incus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and code-on-incus fits your workflow better

full code-on-incus profile →

About iFixAi

iFixAi is an open source Python auditor that answers, in under 120 seconds, whether an AI agent is actually doing the job it is supposed to do — run either by a human operator or by the agent itself.

read the full iFixAi overview →

About code-on-incus

code on incus (coi) is an MIT licensed Go tool that runs AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, and omp inside their own isolated Incus system containers — full Linux machines with root, systemd, and Docker — and adds kernel level active defense that pauses or kills the container when it detects dangerous behavior, for developers who need real machine access without exposing the host or their credentials.

read the full code-on-incus overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs ifixai strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

iFixAi vs strix iFixAi vs shannon iFixAi vs SkillSpector iFixAi vs codex-security iFixAi vs garak iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard iFixAi vs giskard-oss iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter iFixAi vs nono iFixAi vs CyberStrike iFixAi vs AiSOC iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is iFixAi or code-on-incus more popular?

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars and code-on-incus has 720. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.

Are iFixAi and code-on-incus free?

Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and code-on-incus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between iFixAi and code-on-incus?

iFixAi is written in Python and code-on-incus in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, iFixAi or code-on-incus?

Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (15,323 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose code-on-incus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.