head to head · open source
iFixAi vs ARTEX
iFixAi has 30,731 GitHub stars, 1,604 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. ARTEX has 1,485 stars, 712 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. iFixAi leads on adoption by 1,969% (30,731 vs 1,485 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; ARTEX is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. iFixAi has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, ARTEX 48%. ARTEX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| iFixAi | ARTEX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 712 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick iFixAi if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ARTEX if
- You want the ARTEX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and ARTEX fits your workflow better
About iFixAi
iFixAi English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 Independent Auditing of AI Agents Catch your agent's mistakes and blind spots before the shit hits the fan. Quick start • Three ways to run • Test your agent • Scoring • Docs • Contributing One ifixai run , end to end: guided setup picks the system, judge, and suite; the run verifies the connection and saves your config; 32 inspections execute across five pillars; and the result lands as an A–F grade with a scored core pillar scorecard. What it is The existing Eval, Red teaming, and Observability Tools are evaluating the agent mainly based on tech capability (token efficiency…
read the full iFixAi overview →
About ARTEX
ARTEX AI autonomous penetration testing system. Multi agent LLM, Go backend, Next.js frontend. AI 自主渗透测试系统（Go 后端 + Next.js 前端）。 ARTEX is a multi agent system for autonomous penetration testing in an isolated lab: a planner and workers share an asset graph and an exploration graph, with human in the loop approval and full traffic recording. It ships as one binary or a Docker Compose stack. 截图预览 审批记录详情 全局「审批记录」、任务内「拦截审批」及对话中的审批卡片均支持展开查看详情。展示结构参考 AegisHook 的审批详情组件，沿用 ARTEX 的组件和主题： 资产同步（ScopeSentry） 支持从 ScopeSentry 直接同步资产数据，免去重复收集： 在「 资产同步 」页填 ScopeSentry 的地址与 API Key，接入数据源； 按 项目 或 任务 维度选择要同步的目标与资产类型（域名 / 子域 / IP /…
read the full ARTEX overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is iFixAi or ARTEX more popular?
iFixAi has 30,731 GitHub stars and ARTEX has 1,485. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.
Are iFixAi and ARTEX free?
Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ARTEX under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between iFixAi and ARTEX?
iFixAi is written in Python and ARTEX in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, iFixAi or ARTEX?
Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (30,731 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ARTEX if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.