head to head · open source

iFixAi vs akto

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars, 1,333 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. akto has 1,516 stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iFixAi leads on adoption by 911% (15,323 vs 1,516 stars). iFixAi is written in Python under Apache-2.0; akto is written in Java under MIT. iFixAi has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, akto 19%. akto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

iFixAi ★ 15K akto ★ 1.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

iFixAi akto
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 292
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick iFixAi if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full iFixAi profile →

pick akto if

  • You want the akto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and akto fits your workflow better

full akto profile →

About iFixAi

iFixAi is an open source Python auditor that answers, in under 120 seconds, whether an AI agent is actually doing the job it is supposed to do — run either by a human operator or by the agent itself.

read the full iFixAi overview →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs ifixai strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

iFixAi vs strix iFixAi vs shannon iFixAi vs SkillSpector iFixAi vs codex-security iFixAi vs garak iFixAi vs AI-Infra-Guard iFixAi vs giskard-oss iFixAi vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter iFixAi vs nono iFixAi vs CyberStrike iFixAi vs AiSOC iFixAi vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is iFixAi or akto more popular?

iFixAi has 15,323 GitHub stars and akto has 1,516. iFixAi has the larger community by that measure.

Are iFixAi and akto free?

Both are open source. iFixAi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and akto under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between iFixAi and akto?

iFixAi is written in Python and akto in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, iFixAi or akto?

Choose iFixAi if you want the larger community (15,323 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose akto if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.