head to head · open source

i-have-adhd vs web-maker

i-have-adhd has 49,912 GitHub stars, 2,876 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. web-maker has 2,698 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. i-have-adhd leads on adoption by 1,750% (49,912 vs 2,698 stars). i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. i-have-adhd has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. i-have-adhd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

i-have-adhd ★ 50K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

i-have-adhd web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full i-have-adhd profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

i-have-adhd vs ECC i-have-adhd vs react i-have-adhd vs Langflow i-have-adhd vs Supabase i-have-adhd vs puppeteer i-have-adhd vs archify i-have-adhd vs PocketBase i-have-adhd vs codebase-memory-mcp i-have-adhd vs ToolJet i-have-adhd vs AppSmith i-have-adhd vs it-tools i-have-adhd vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is i-have-adhd or web-maker more popular?

i-have-adhd has 49,912 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,698. i-have-adhd has the larger community by that measure.

Are i-have-adhd and web-maker free?

Both are open source. i-have-adhd is licensed under MIT and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between i-have-adhd and web-maker?

i-have-adhd is written in Python and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, i-have-adhd or web-maker?

Choose i-have-adhd if you want the larger community (49,912 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.