head to head · open source

ECC vs i-have-adhd

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. i-have-adhd has 48,794 stars, 2,838 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 439% (263,046 vs 48,794 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, i-have-adhd 6%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (developer-tools, productivity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K i-have-adhd ★ 49K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC i-have-adhd
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 49K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You want the i-have-adhd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and i-have-adhd fits your workflow better

full i-have-adhd profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or i-have-adhd more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and i-have-adhd has 48,794. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and i-have-adhd free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and i-have-adhd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and i-have-adhd?

ECC is written in JavaScript and i-have-adhd in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or i-have-adhd?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose i-have-adhd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.