head to head · open source

PocketBase vs i-have-adhd

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars, 3,694 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. i-have-adhd has 48,794 stars, 2,838 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PocketBase leads on adoption by 25% (61,103 vs 48,794 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, i-have-adhd 6%. i-have-adhd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K i-have-adhd ★ 49K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase i-have-adhd
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 49K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You want the i-have-adhd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and i-have-adhd fits your workflow better

full i-have-adhd profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs it-tools PocketBase vs herdr PocketBase vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or i-have-adhd more popular?

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars and i-have-adhd has 48,794. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and i-have-adhd free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and i-have-adhd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and i-have-adhd?

PocketBase is written in Go and i-have-adhd in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or i-have-adhd?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,103 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose i-have-adhd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.