head to head · open source
huginn vs transmittable-thread-local
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. transmittable-thread-local has 8,305 stars, 1,721 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. huginn leads on adoption by 505% (50,269 vs 8,305 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; transmittable-thread-local is written in Java under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, transmittable-thread-local 21%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | transmittable-thread-local | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 8.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick transmittable-thread-local if
- You want the transmittable-thread-local feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and transmittable-thread-local fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About transmittable-thread-local
[!IMPORTANT] 🚧 这个分支是 TransmittableThreadLocal(TTL) v3 ，在开发中还没有发布。 v3 的版本说明、工作项列表及其进展，参见 issue 432。 👉 目前使用中的稳定发布版本 v2.x 在 分支 2.x 上。 📖 English Documentation 📖 中文文档 🔧 功能 🎨 需求场景 👥 User Guide 1. 简单使用 2. 保证线程池中传递值 2.1 修饰 Runnable 和 Callable 整个过程的完整时序图 2.2 修饰线程池 2.3 使用 Java Agent 来修饰 JDK 线程池实现类 Java Agent 的启动参数配置 🔌 Java API Docs 🍪 Maven依赖 🔨 关于编译构建 ❓ FAQ ✨ 使用 TTL 的好处与必要性 🗿 更多文档 📚 相关资料 JDK Core Classes 💗 Who Used 👷 Contributors 🔧 功能 👉 TransmittableThreadLocal ( TTL )：在使用线程池等会池化复用线程的执行组件情况下，提供 ThreadLocal 值的传递功能，解决异步执行时上下文传递的问题。一个 Java 标准库本应为框架/中间件设施开发提供的标配能力，本库功能聚焦 & 0依赖，支持 Java 6 21 。 JDK 的…
read the full transmittable-thread-local overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or transmittable-thread-local more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and transmittable-thread-local has 8,305. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and transmittable-thread-local free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and transmittable-thread-local under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and transmittable-thread-local?
huginn is written in Ruby and transmittable-thread-local in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or transmittable-thread-local?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose transmittable-thread-local if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.