head to head · open source
huginn vs TokenTracker
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TokenTracker has 1,659 stars, 172 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 2,912% (49,969 vs 1,659 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; TokenTracker is written in JavaScript under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, TokenTracker 10%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | TokenTracker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 172 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TokenTracker if
- You want the TokenTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and TokenTracker fits your workflow better
About huginn
Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.
read the full huginn overview →
About TokenTracker
TokenTracker is a local first AI token usage and cost tracker for AI coding tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and the DeepSeek Harness, delivered as a CLI, a local web dashboard, and native desktop apps for macOS, Windows, and Linux.
read the full TokenTracker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or TokenTracker more popular?
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars and TokenTracker has 1,659. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and TokenTracker free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and TokenTracker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and TokenTracker?
huginn is written in Ruby and TokenTracker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or TokenTracker?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose TokenTracker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.