head to head · open source
huginn vs qtap
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qtap has 1,465 stars, 57 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 3,331% (50,269 vs 1,465 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; qtap is written in C under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qtap 4%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qtap if
- You want the qtap feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and qtap fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About qtap
An eBPF agent that captures traffic flowing through the Linux kernel. By attaching to TLS/SSL functions, data is intercepted before and after encryption and then passed to flexible plugins with full visibility along with all of the available context process/container/host/user/protocol/etc. Qtap makes it possible to understand what's happening with your egress traffic, without modifying apps, installing proxies, or managing certs. Qtap shows you exactly what data is being sent and received in its original, unencrypted form while operating out of band with minimal overhead, without adding latency or disrupting…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or qtap more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and qtap has 1,465. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and qtap free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and qtap under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and qtap?
huginn is written in Ruby and qtap in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or qtap?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qtap if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.