head to head · open source

huginn vs psutil

huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars, 4,298 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. psutil has 11,276 stars, 1,514 forks, 258 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 343% (49,967 vs 11,276 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; psutil is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, psutil 13%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

huginn ★ 50K psutil ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

huginn psutil
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 11K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Ruby Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 4.3K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick huginn if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full huginn profile →

pick psutil if

  • You want the psutil feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and psutil fits your workflow better

full psutil profile →

About huginn

Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.

read the full huginn overview →

About psutil

psutil is a cross platform Python library for retrieving information about running processes and system utilization — CPU, memory, disks, network and sensors — for developers and operators who need that data programmatically from inside Python code rather than from shell output.

read the full psutil overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

huginn vs Uptime Kuma huginn vs worldmonitor huginn vs NetData huginn vs Grafana huginn vs Sentry huginn vs SigNoz huginn vs Grafana Loki huginn vs beszel huginn vs cilium huginn vs Apache SkyWalking huginn vs jaeger huginn vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is huginn or psutil more popular?

huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars and psutil has 11,276. huginn has the larger community by that measure.

Are huginn and psutil free?

Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and psutil under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between huginn and psutil?

huginn is written in Ruby and psutil in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, huginn or psutil?

Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,967 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psutil if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.