head to head · open source
huginn vs Peekaping
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,210 stars, 87 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 4,054% (50,269 vs 1,210 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 7%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | Peekaping | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 87 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Peekaping if
- You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About Peekaping
Peekaping the best uptime kuma alternative A modern, self hosted uptime monitoring solution Peekaping is a uptime monitoring system built with Golang and React. You can monitor your websites, API and many more leveraging beautiful status pages, alert notifications. 🔗 Website peekaping.com 🔗 Live Demo demo.peekaping.com 🔗 Documentation docs.peekaping.com 🔗 Community terraform provider registry.terraform.io/providers/tafaust/peekaping Why Peekaping Is the Optimal Alternative to Uptime Kuma Peekaping is a modern uptime monitoring solution designed with the requirements of professional DevOps teams in mind…
read the full Peekaping overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or Peekaping more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,210. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and Peekaping free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and Peekaping?
huginn is written in Ruby and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or Peekaping?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.