head to head · open source
huginn vs openwolf
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped today. openwolf has 2,342 stars, 209 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 2,034% (49,969 vs 2,342 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; openwolf is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, openwolf 9%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | openwolf | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 209 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openwolf if
- You want the openwolf feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openwolf fits your workflow better
About huginn
Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.
read the full huginn overview →
About openwolf
OpenWolf Keep project memory across your coding agents. OpenWolf keeps task context, project maps and known fixes in one local folder. Help Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode continue saved work and find relevant code. Reduce repeated context and review recorded token usage by agent and model. Memory and indexing run locally without extra model calls. Hooks: Claude Code, Codex CLI · Plugin: OpenCode · Compatible hooks: Grok Build · Context only: Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity What it does A coding session produces useful context: the task objective, files changed, failed tests and the next action. That information …
read the full openwolf overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or openwolf more popular?
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars and openwolf has 2,342. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and openwolf free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and openwolf under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and openwolf?
huginn is written in Ruby and openwolf in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or openwolf?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openwolf if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.